 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Law
Office Of Daniel Bakondi, A Professional Law Corporation Phone:
(415) 450 - 0424 TENANT IN COMMON TIC INVESTMENT PROPERTY SECURITIES FRAUD ATTORNEY INVESTMENT SAN FRANCISCO LITIGATION ATTORNEY SAN FRANCISCO BUSINESS ATTORNEY SAN FRANCISCO REAL ESTATE ATTORNEY CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT LAW FIRM ATTORNEY HIGH PROFILE LITIGATION ATTORNEY
|
Tenant in
Common (TIC) Investment Fraud
Attorney Daniel Bakondi focuses on securities law and investment recovery, including recovering investment losses from tenancy in common (TIC) investments. Many investors are led into tenant in common TIC
investments from a broker who promises tax savings from a 1031 exchange
by purchasing a like-kind property. Sometimes
real estate brokers or investment
advisors recommend a tenant in common investment as "safe real
estate." This is often false. Many TICS are not safe
investments, nor are they even real estate in the typical sense.
Unlike most real estate, these are securities for which there is often
no market and cannot be resold. TICS are often completely
illiquid securities that many investors dont know the true or current
value of. Securities brokers or "financial advisors" sometimes sell TICS because a sponsor is promoting it to them, and their motivation may be commissions many times the rate of selling a more secure investment. Often, your intended tax savings from the 1031 exchange are eaten up by broker commissions and outright cash straight into the pocket of the sponsor. In fact, many TICS are horrible investments that should have never been sold. Tenant in common TIC investments often result in
a total loss to the investor. The Still, many investors have a difficult time deciding to take action, hire an attorney, and try to recoup their investment. At the first sign of problems, you should act immediately. Brokers and sponsors can only hope that investors delay until it is too late to act, and impossible to obtain a recovery. The law limits the time you have to seek a recovery of your investment. Has your TIC investment had a cash call? Has your TIC investment stopped paying distributions?
Is the building going into foreclosure? For many tenant in common
investments, the
broker and sponsor violated so many rules, that an attorney bringing a
securities arbitration claim in FINRA Financial Regulatory Authority or
a lawsuit may obtain an award for part or full recovery of your entire
investment, sometimes even plus interest - if the investor bring a
claim in time. What laws do brokers and financial advisors violate in selling a tenant in common tic investment? Sometimes
stock-brokers or investment advisors sell a tenancy in common
investment and fail to adequately perform due diligence. They
fail to research the company, the people behind the company, and the
structure of the deal. Sometimes the sponsors or master tenants
have a history of
bankruptcies or other business problems. Sometimes Sometimes
there are material omissions or misrepresentations in the private
placement memorandum, advertisements, or other offering materials which
clearly amount to securities fraud.
When this is the case, often the broker selling the investment either
know
of these problems and do not disclose them, turn a
blind eye to them, or do not Sometimes
brokers sell tenancy in common investments that are unsuitable for the
investor. Often TICS are sold even though they are far too risky
for an investor’s risk
tolerance. Many investors who end up with tenant in common
interests are looking for a very safe investment, and have little risk
tolerance. Brokers blatantly breach duties when they sell Sometimes
a broker or investment advisor breaches his or her fiduciary duty in
selling a private placement. If a broker puts his or her
financial interest ahead Sometimes
the security is unregistered, or the investor is not accredited or
sophisticated, or forged documents, or the
legally sufficient prior business relationship does not exist between
the investor and the
broker. Sometimes appraisal inconsistencies, markups, commissions and fees from the simple sale of the tenant in common put millions of dollars into the pockets of brokers and sponsors involved in the deal. Sometimes
the deals are structured so that the master tenant of a master lease
stands only to profit and has no obligation with any real financial
backing to the investor in case subtenants do not pay rent, or other
expenses arise. If
your tenancy in common is not performing as expected, please contact
Attorney Daniel Bakondi to investigate your case and determine whether
your broker may have done something wrong in selling an investment to
you, and whether some or all of your investment may be recoverable. Current
investigations: Please
contact us if you own a tenancy in common tic investment sold by one of
the following sponsors that is having problems, facing cash call, or
foreclosure:
Please note: This website does not make any allegations other than that we are investigating various tenant in common investments sponsored by the sponsors above. For an analysis of your TIC
investment, please contact Mr. Bakondi via the email address at the top
of the page, or click
here for more information about TIC investment
problems.
Mr. Bakondi does take some tenant in common TIC
investment loss recovery cases on a contingency fee basis, including
broker and financial advisor fraud cases. If you have concerns
about your investment, please contact Mr. Bakondi for a discussion and
free analysis of your case.
IMPORTANT: READ OUR PRIVACY POLICY AND
DISCLAIMER - CLICK HERE Tenancy In Common TIC fraud attorney lawyer in San Francisco, South San Francisco, Marin, Oakland, Francisco, South San Francisco, Marin, SF Bay Area, Oakland, Santa Clara, Hayward, San Mateo, Palo Alto, Daly City, San Jose, Berkeley, San Leandro, Albany, Richmond, Alameda, Walnut Creek, Concord, Livermore, Fremont, Dublin, Castro Valley, Pleasanton, San Ramon, Contra Costa, Marin, San Rafael, Novato, Larkspur, Mill Valley, Corte Madera, Sausalito, Ross, Kentfield, San Anselmo, Tiburon, Belvedere, Fairfax, Petaluma, Santa Rosa, Cotati, Rohnert Park, Sebasterpol, Vallejo, Martinez, Concord, Pleasant Hill, Lafayette, Redwood City, Palo Alto, Mountainview, Guerneville, Forestville, Windsor, Calistoga, Napa, Sonoma, Sacramento, Goleta, Stockton, Modesto, Fresno, Chico, Redding, Yuba, Eureka, Fortuna, Klamath Falls, Crescent City, Tahoe, Bakersfield, San Luis Obispo, Santa Maria, Los Angeles, Long Beach, Santa Ana, Riverside, San Bernadino, San Diego, La Jolla, Marin County Superior Court, Alameda Superior Court, San Francisco Superior Court, San Mateo Superior Court, Santa Clara Superior Court, Del Norte County, Siskiyou County, Humbolt County, Trinity County, Shasta County, Plumas County, Glenn County, Lassen County, Mendocino County, Colusa County, Napa County, Sonoma County, Lake County, El Dorado County, Yolo County, Solano County, San Joaquin County, Calaveras County, Contra Costa County, Alameda County, Merced County, Placer County, Madera County, Tulare County, San Diego County Superior Court, Los Angeles County Superior Court, Monterey County, San Benito County, Santa Clara County, Marin County, Santa Barbara, Ventura, Mariposa, Kings, San Mateo, Sierra, Superior Court of California, Federal Court in California. Finra arbitration regarding tic tenant in common investment properties in Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming states.
|